Climate Gate

...now browsing by tag

 
 

Climate change showdown

Friday, June 11th, 2010

*note from Vanversive* Five bucks the administration uses this whole BP Gulf oil gusher to try and push more cap and tax legislation. Since Copenhagen went up in flames they hopped to use the EPA to regulate carbon emissions at the local level. Seems this legislation that Obama seeks to veto in this article could be a double edge sword for him.

Alexander Bolton
The Hill

Democratic leaders are scrambling to prevent the Senate from delivering a stinging slap to President Barack Obama on climate change.

They have offered a vote on a bill they dislike in the hopes of avoiding a loss on legislation Obama hates.

The president is threatening to veto a resolution from Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) that would ban the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from regulating carbon emissions.

But if the president were forced to use his veto to prevent legislation emerging from a Congress in which his own party enjoys substantial majorities, it would be a humiliation for him and for Democrats on Capitol Hill.

Read full article

Markey panel to address ‘deniers’ head-on

Tuesday, May 4th, 2010

E&E News
By Paul Voosen

Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) will seek to further restore the public credibility of climate science this Thursday by hosting several top American researchers in an explanatory hearing that, his office promises, “will address the claims of deniers head-on.”

The Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming hearing follows news yesterday that the InterAcademy Council, an alliance of many of the world’s science academies, had chosen its panel to review the methods of the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Flaws and typos revealed in the IPCC’s influential 2007 report, particularly an error exaggerating the risk global warming poses to Himalayan glaciers, have damaged the panel’s standing and given ammunition to those critical of science underlying climate change.

The IPCC review, requested by the United Nations, will be led by Harold Shapiro, an economist and former president of Princeton University. The peer-review report will examine, among other topics, the literature that may be cited in IPCC reports — several errors stemmed from NGO or government reports that were not peer-reviewed — and data quality control. The panel expects to deliver its findings by the end of August. (See related story in today’s ClimateWire.)

Markey, the committee’s chairman and sponsor of the House-passed climate bill (H.R. 2454), will hear from three past and future American contributors to the IPCC, who will be tasked with laying out the fundamental science behind climate change.

The panel will also hear from Lisa Graumlich, the director of the School of Natural Resources and the Environment at the University of Arizona, who served on a British panel investigating the conduct of scientists at the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia. Intemperate e-mails leaked from the unit last winter gave rise to allegations that climate scientists sought to squash dissent and manipulate temperature data (ClimateWire, April 15).

Last month, the panel cleared the unit and its researchers of any malpractice.

“We saw no evidence of any deliberate scientific malpractice in any of the work of the Climatic Research Unit and had it been there we believe that it is likely that we would have detected it,” the reviewers said. “Rather we found a small group of dedicated if slightly disorganized researchers who were ill-prepared for being the focus of public attention.”

Also testifying to the panel will be another Briton, Lord Christopher Monckton, a hereditary peer in the House of Lords and prominent critic of the scientific consensus supporting anthropogenic climate change.



Read full article

US Senate climate bill to be unveiled April 26

Saturday, April 17th, 2010

Reuters

WASHINGTON, April 15 (Reuters) – A long-awaited compromise bill to reduce U.S. emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases blamed for global warming will be unveiled by a group of senators on April 26, sources said on Thursday.

The legislative language to be sketched out in 11 days, according to government and environmental sources, is being drafted by Democratic Senator John Kerry, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham and independent Senator Joseph Lieberman.

Backers of the environmental bill hope the unveiling will pave the way for the full Senate to debate and pass a measure in June or July if the compromise attracts enough support from a group of moderate Republicans and Democrats.

Republican Senator Judd Gregg told Reuters he was “committed to getting something that addresses our energy needs in a constructive and comprehensive way.” He added he did not know yet whether he would support the bill being developed.

President Barack Obama has made climate change one of his top priorities and took steps recently to show Republicans he was serious, including expanding federal aid for building nuclear power facilities and allowing more domestic offshore oil drilling — initiatives to be included in the Senate compromise.

The White House is also eager to show the rest of the world the United States is ready to take a leadership role on global warming, including to help kick-start stalled international efforts to tackle the problem.

Despite vocal climate change skeptics in the United States, leading scientific groups have been hoping the United States, the biggest emitter of greenhouse gases after China, would take action.

Read entire article

Arctic ice recovers from the great melt

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

TimeOnline

IF you thought it was cold in Britain for the time of year, you should see what is happening around the North Pole. Scientists have discovered that the size of the Arctic ice cap has increased sharply to levels not seen since 2001.

A shift in the chilly winds across the Bering Sea over the past few months has caused thousands of square miles of ocean to freeze.

The same phenomenon, known as the Arctic Oscillation, is also partly responsible for the cold winter experienced in northern Europe and eastern America.

It allowed icy blasts of air to escape from the Arctic and make their way southwards. Provisional Met Office figures for December to February suggest the UK had its coldest winter since 1979, with an average temperature of 1.6C — a full 2.1C below normal. Last week a teenager was killed in Scotland when a school bus crashed in the snow — just days into British Summer Time.
Related Links

The Arctic Oscillation usually acts like a ring of strong winds circulating anti-clockwise around the North Pole to dam up cold Arctic air. This year it has turned “negative”, meaning the ring has broken down, allowing blasts of cold air to escape to lower latitudes.

Mark Serreze, director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) in Colorado, is surprised by the Arctic’s recovery from the great melt of 2007 when summer ice shrank to its smallest recorded extent.

“It has been a crazy winter with Arctic ice cover growing and very cold weather in northern Europe and eastern America all linked to this strongly negative Arctic Oscillation,” Serreze said.

Vicky Pope, a Met Office scientist, said the Arctic Oscillation had affected weather across the hemisphere. “It also played a part in the very warm weather experienced in the Mediterranean, and western Canada, where the winter Olympics were at risk of too little snow,” she said.

Scientists emphasise that the regrowth of ice in the Arctic and the fierce US blizzards are natural variations in weather which have little relevance for long-term climate change.

“Records kept by Nasa show that in January and February global average temperatures were actually well above the long-term average by around 0.7C,” Serreze said.

Such caution contrasts with the warnings issued by scientists in 2007 when the north polar ice cap suffered a spectacular summer melt.

It hit an all-time low size of 1.65m square miles, about 39% below average, prompting many scientists, including some at the NSIDC, to suggest that global warming had pushed the Arctic to a tipping point from which it might not recover.

By last summer, however, the ice cap had expanded to 2m square miles and this year’s figures show it approaching normal levels for the time of year.

“In retrospect, the reactions to the 2007 melt were overstated. The lesson is that we must be more careful in not reading too much into one event,” Serreze said.

The Met Office had taken a more cautious approach in 2007, warning that the melting was a natural variation so the ice was likely to recover.

Scientists have made mistakes over other short-term trends such as increases in tropical storms. In 2004-5 an increase in the number and severity of storms, including Hurricane Katrina, prompted some researchers to suggest a link with global warming — but this was then followed by a decline in storms.

Similar fears were raised in 2005 when scientists at Southampton University published research showing that some deep Atlantic Ocean currents, linked to the Gulf Stream, had slowed by a third.

They issued a press release entitled “Could the Atlantic current switch off?” which suggested that circulation in the ocean, which gives Europe its temperate climate, might shut down. But more recent studies have shown that such currents slow down and speed up naturally, so short-term changes cannot be seen as evidence of global warming.

“The reality is that greenhouse gases are making the world warmer, but it is a mistake to see short-term changes in weather, currents or Arctic ice cover as evidence of this,” Pope said.

“Instead you have to look at long-term trends. These show that Arctic summer sea ice is decreasing by 232,000 square miles a decade, nearly 2.5 times the area of Great Britain.

“On current trends it will still become ice-free in summer by around 2060.”

Greenpeace calling for violence?

Monday, April 5th, 2010

By Jason Van Gilder
vanversive.net

If you have been paying attention, the media as of late has been doing everything in their power to expose “right wing extremism” throwing in all kinds of guilty by association tactics to try and discredit some grassroots movements. However I doubt you will see them reporting about this

Gene from greenpeace wrote a blog with some pretty serious violent claims. Going as far to say that anybody who doubts climate change to watch their back “We know who you are. We know where you live. We know where you work.” Gene not only threatens anybody who has a dissenting opinion to climate change, he calls for climate activists to now become “climate outlaws“.

The politicians have failed. Now it’s up to us. We must break the law to make the laws we need: laws that are supposed to protect society, and protect our future. Until our laws do that, screw being climate lobbyists. Screw being climate activists. It’s not working. We need an army of climate outlaws.”

Green peace has yet to file a retraction to the article however at the top of the blog they go as far to protect their organization by exclaiming they are peaceful and that the article is only going as far as civil disobedience.

Greenpeace has almost 40 years of history as a peaceful organization. Two of our core values are:

* We ‘bear witness’ to environmental destruction in a peaceful, non-violent manner.

* We use non-violent confrontation to raise the level and quality of public debate.

This blog entry is about encouraging civil disobedience and non-violent direct action – the kind of peaceful methods that liberated Gene’s country (India) from imperialism.

I know Gene, and he’s a genuinely peaceful guy who believes in the power of peaceful protest to change the world. Some people are trying to portray him as otherwise. Just read what he had to say in context. He is very specific about what he thinks people should do.

While we encourage and appreciate discussion in the comments, do stay polite and don’t make death threats or incite violence. (Not towards our staff, not towards people we disagree with, not towards anyone. Please be nice people. Thanks.)

– Andrew (Greenpeace web producer)

Now im not for guilty of association tactics at all. However I will point out the hypocrisy of the main stream media, since they are so quick to tag libertarians, gun owners, militias, conservatives, and others all within one nice little “right wing extremism package”.

More news on this as it unfolds. Stay tuned.

Cant tax the sun? Just block it out!

Friday, March 26th, 2010

By Jason Van Gilder
vanversive.net

If you haven’t heard health reform has passed in the United States, and already to see the tax increases to pay until it goes active around 2014. Some of the increases range from families who make over 200 to 250 thousands a year, a promise Obama made in his campaign never to do. Those aside there are some strange abnormalities in this bill

There is a 10 percent excise tax on all tanning beds that have to go into effect before June 30th 2010. Why not just tax the sun while they are at it? People in this country are already vitamin D deficient and this tax is a sign of things to come.

Remember when John Holdren told the associated press that global warming was so bad that we may need to block out the sun? Combine that with reports that vitamin D is better for the flu than vaccines and you might have a major problem in the government’s eyes.
If the government could tax the sun they would, since they can’t they will go after the next best thing, which is tanning beds and UV bulbs. They want to lock you into the sickness industry that is our medical system. By using scare tactics and excess taxes they will get their way. It’s about limiting choice and making people dependent on them. The idea that Holdren mentioned blocking out the sun’s rays to prevent global warming should be a red flag for anything. Top that off with John McCain’s Codex Alimentarius bill and you have a formula for complete control leading to an unhealthy life, unless a doctor deems you can join the ranks of the healthy. If things keep going the way they are Mr.Burns will have finally succeeded in blocking out the sun.

(video)The Story of Cap & Trade

Friday, March 26th, 2010

Jason Van Gilder
vanversive.net

Personally im not on the whole global warming bandwagon. I do however believe in cleaning up the environment. I chose this video because it points how hardcore environmentalists know that cap and trade is a scam, and its just not the global warning deniers as Al Gore calls us who are against it. Its always good to look at the other side even if we don’t agree, especially if they know its a scam as well. Enjoy the video feel free to comment.